Twenty Thousand Leagues under the Sea / Loss of Tradition
The captain and passengers do not prepare for their departure by offering propitiatory sacrifices; and, on their return, they no longer go ornamented with wreaths and gilt fillets to thank the gods in the neighbouring temple.” “I agree with you,” said I; “and steam seems to have killed all gratitude in the hearts of sailors. But, Captain, since you seem to have especially studied this sea, can you tell me the origin of its name?” “There exist several explanations on the subject, M. Would you like to know the opinion of a chronicler of the fourteenth century?” “Willingly.” “This fanciful writer pretends that its name was given to it after the passage of the Israelites, when Pharaoh perished in the waves which closed at the voice of Moses.” “A poet’s explanation, Captain Nemo,” I replied; “but I cannot content myself with that. I ask you for your personal opinion.” “Here it is, M.
Microstory
As the ship's engines roared to life, the salty spray of the ocean tinged the air, mixing with the acrid scent of steam. Captain Nemo, a figure draped in shadows, stood resolute, his eyes reflecting both the azure depths and the weight of forgotten rituals. The passengers, mere silhouettes in their haste, paid no heed to the echoes of the past, their hearts untouched by the gratitude once offered to the sea’s guardians. In the distance, a temple lay silent, its once-bustling worshipers reduced to mere memories as the vessel surged forward into the uncharted blue. (AI-generated story)
The interplay between ancient customs and modern mechanization in this excerpt highlights a significant cultural shift in maritime practices. The absence of rituals such as sacrifices or thanksgiving in the face of steam technology indicates a broader theme of progress eroding traditional values. Captain Nemo's reference to a chronicler of the fourteenth century further emphasizes the tension between historical narratives and contemporary realities, suggesting that the legacy of the past often clashes with the relentless march of innovation. This dialogue encapsulates the struggle to maintain a connection with spirituality and gratitude in an increasingly industrial world, enhancing its literary significance within the context of Jules Verne's critique of modernity. (AI-generated commentary)